← Search

Cindy Broussard

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bakersfield, CA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
143 matches · 100W–43L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history143 matches
W
2026-10-24 · ROEDING PK TENNIS CL/ROEDING PK CW8.5A · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Natalie Chene
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
Default
2026-09-13 · Team Chene/Broussard · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kiana Lua
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-29 · ROEDING PK TENNIS CL/ROEDING PK CW8.5A · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Natalie Chene
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-28 · Team Chene/Broussard · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eileen Lua
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-17 · Team Chene/Broussard · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kellie Dibble
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-16 · Team Chene/Broussard · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kellie Dibble
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-08-15 · ROEDING PK TENNIS CL/ROEDING PK 18AW4.5A · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Eileen Lua championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-14 · ROEDING PK TENNIS CL/ROEDING PK 18AW4.5A · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Eileen Lua championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-08-14 · ROEDING PK TENNIS CL/ROEDING PK 18AW4.5A · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Eileen Lua championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-30 · Team Chene/Broussard · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natalie Chene
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-16 · ROEDING PK TENNIS CL/ROEDING PK 40AW4.5A · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kellie Dibble championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-16 · ROEDING PK TENNIS CL/ROEDING PK 40AW4.5A · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Liza Chen championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
70.6%
12W–5L · 59.2% of games
3.5
100%
4W–0L · 77.4% of games
4.0
86.2%
56W–9L · 66.1% of games
4.5
56.5%
13W–10L · 59.2% of games
8.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 61.8% of games
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 53.4% of games
8.0mixed
26.3%
5W–14L · 44.7% of games
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
66 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
26 matches
#1 Singles
4%
6 matches
Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert