← Search

Natalie Chene

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bakersfield, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
107 matches · 84W–23L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history107 matches
L
2026-11-01 · Emerald Aces · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lauren Eittreim
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-24 · ROEDING PK TENNIS CL/ROEDING PK CW8.5A · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Cindy Broussard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-09-27 · Emerald Aces · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hyejung Oh
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-20 · Emerald Aces · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lauren Eittreim
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-09-19 · ROEDING PK TENNIS CL/ROEDING PK CW8.5A · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Seng Leang Tang
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-09-13 · Team Rodriguez · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Eittreim
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-09-11 · Team Chene/Broussard · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sheridan Hadaway
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-09-06 · Team Rodriguez · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Eittreim
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-08-30 · Team Rodriguez · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hyejung Oh
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-29 · ROEDING PK TENNIS CL/ROEDING PK CW8.5A · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Cindy Broussard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-23 · Team Rodriguez · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Eittreim
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-17 · Team Chene/Broussard · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sheridan Hadaway
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
100%
6W–0L · 69.5% of games
3.0
61.1%
11W–7L · 56.1% of games
3.5
83.3%
30W–6L · 63.9% of games
4.0
77.1%
27W–8L · 55.2% of games
4.5
100%
5W–0L · 76.2% of games
8.5
50%
2W–2L · 51.2% of games
8.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
25 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert