← Search

Jeff Varick

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ann Arbor, MI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
108 matches · 41W–67L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history108 matches
W
2026-10-31 · LIB-Lawson 3.0M Fall Singles F2 · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-3
L
2026-07-31 · LIB-Atkinson 18s 3.0M F2 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Griffin Boustany championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-0
L
2026-07-20 · LIB-Rosenwasser 40s 3.5M F3 · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-16 · LIB-Atkinson 18s 3.0M F2 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Walter Perkins
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-14 · LIB-Reynolds 40s 3.0M F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barry St Pierre
loading the estimate
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-07-07 · LIB-Reynolds 40s 3.0M F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with John Elliott
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-02 · LIB-Atkinson 18s 3.0M F2 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Aaron Ward
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-01 · LIB-Katakowski 18s 3.5M F2 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gregory Ensing
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-06-10 · LIB-Katakowski 18s 3.5M F2 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Antony Hsu
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-02 · LIB-Reynolds 40s 3.0M F1 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gregory Ensing
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-05-19 · LIB-Reynolds 40s 3.0M F1 · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-05-12 · LIB-Reynolds 40s 3.0M F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gregory Ensing
loading the estimate
5-7, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
42.9%
21W–28L · 49.7% of games
3.5
33.3%
8W–16L · 39.2% of games
6.0
25%
2W–6L · 40.2% of games
6.5
26.7%
4W–11L · 41.4% of games
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 45.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
40 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
23 matches
#1 Singles
7%
8 matches
#2 Singles
5%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova