← Search

Barry St Pierre

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ann Arbor, MI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
283 matches · 113W–170L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history283 matches
W
2026-11-01 · LIB-Barden 6.0X 55&O F · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lichee St. Pierre mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-5
W
Default
2026-10-31 · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Sean Robenalt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-10-30 · #3 Doubles · with Michael Chaize
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-10-25 · LIB-Barden 6.0X 55&O F · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lichee St. Pierre mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-10-18 · LIB-Barden 6.0X 55&O F · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lichee St. Pierre mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-10-04 · LIB-Barden 6.0X 55&O F · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lichee St. Pierre mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-10-03 · #3 Doubles · with Vivek Subramaniam Sambamurthy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-04 · LIB-Kornfeld 18s 7.0X F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ariel Wan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-23 · LIB-Atkinson 18s 3.0M F2 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Pohl
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-07-14 · LIB-Reynolds 40s 3.0M F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeff Varick
loading the estimate
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-07-09 · LIB-Atkinson 18s 3.0M F2 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Pohl
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-06 · LIB-Rosenwasser 40s 3.5M F3 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Edward Karpiel
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams71 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
0.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
52.6%
10W–9L · 53.4% of games
3.5
38.8%
33W–52L · 44.7% of games
4.0
34.8%
8W–15L · 42.3% of games
5.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
13.3%
2W–13L · 36.6% of games
7.0
39.5%
15W–23L · 44.7% of games
7.5
60%
9W–6L · 55.7% of games
6.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 53.7% of games
6.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
37.3%
25W–42L · 43.7% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
108 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
81 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
68 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
12 matches
#2 Singles
3%
8 matches
Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams