← Search

Meredith Plains

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Birmingham, AL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
114 matches · 56W–58L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history114 matches
L
2026-10-29 · West Homewood - Lacey/Bingham · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-15 · West Homewood - Lacey/Bingham · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Cole
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-10-03 · VCC - LaRocca · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-09-24 · West Homewood - Lacey/Bingham · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-19 · VCC - LaRocca · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-03 · West Homewood - Lacey/Bingham · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Sheffer
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
W
Default
2026-08-25 · Hoover Met - Nace/ Bird · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Meghan Bradley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-04 · Hoover Met - Nace/ Bird · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alyssa Bird
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-21 · Hoover Met - Nace/ Bird · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shannon Rodgers
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-08 · Hoover Met - Miller/Nace 3.0-4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karly Trent
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-25 · Hoover Met - Miller/Nace 3.0-4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paige Whitt
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-10 · VCC - Smithson/Lutz · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lani Perrigo
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
50%
32W–32L · 49.5% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
56.2%
9W–7L · 53.3% of games
8.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 34.4% of games
7.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 63.7% of games
8.0mixed
43.8%
7W–9L · 45.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
50 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
20 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer