← Search

Rebecca Sheffer

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Birmingham, AL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
352 matches · 256W–96L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history352 matches
W
2026-10-15 · West Homewood - Lacey/Bingham · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Belue
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-10-01 · West Homewood - Lacey/Bingham · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Margaret Lacey
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-25 · Homewood - Haines · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Belue
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-09-24 · West Homewood - Lacey/Bingham · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robin Griffis
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-09-19 · West Homewood - Barber/Lacey · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Belue
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-09-11 · Homewood - Haines · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robin Griffis
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-03 · West Homewood - Lacey/Bingham · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meredith Plains
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-08-26 · Homewood - Lacey · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lexi Ginsburg
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-17 · Homewood - Lacey · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lexi Ginsburg
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-31 · Homewood - Lacey · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Katie Petrella
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-13 · Homewood - Lacey · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lexi Ginsburg
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-24 · West Homewood - Sheffer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robin Griffis
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams89 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
84%
63W–12L · 68.9% of games
3.5
69.7%
108W–47L · 58.9% of games
4.0
58.3%
14W–10L · 53.2% of games
5.5
75%
3W–1L · 54.3% of games
6.5
72.1%
49W–19L · 62.6% of games
7.5
70%
7W–3L · 52.4% of games
3.5mixed
70%
7W–3L · 55% of games
7.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 59% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
193 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
91 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
60 matches
#2 Singles
1%
5 matches
#1 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova