← Search

Margaret Lacey

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Birmingham, AL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
197 matches · 130W–67L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history197 matches
W
2026-10-17 · West Homewood - Barber/Lacey · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Belue
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-10-01 · West Homewood - Lacey/Bingham · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Sheffer
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-24 · West Homewood - Lacey/Bingham · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-09-17 · West Homewood - Lacey/Bingham · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caroline Hoke Alexander
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-09-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caroline Hoke Alexander championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-09-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hayley House championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-09-03 · West Homewood - Lacey/Bingham · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caroline Hoke Alexander
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-08-26 · Homewood - Lacey · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lauren Calagaz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-08-17 · Homewood - Lacey · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lauren Calagaz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-03 · Homewood - Lacey · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Sellers
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-31 · Homewood - Lacey · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Chadha
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-22 · Homewood - Bingham/Lacey · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Annie Lacey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 58.8% of games
3.0
57.5%
23W–17L · 53.9% of games
3.5
63%
51W–30L · 55.5% of games
4.0
72.2%
13W–5L · 58.5% of games
6.5
66.7%
16W–8L · 53.5% of games
7.5
85%
17W–3L · 58.4% of games
8.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
63 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
36 matches
#1 Singles
13%
25 matches
#2 Singles
11%
22 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer