← Search

Jennifer Lancaster

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Birmingham, AL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
166 matches · 58W–108L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history166 matches
L
2026-11-02 · Inverness CC - Rudder Mon PM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Vines
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-10-26 · Inverness CC - Rudder Mon PM · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Butler
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-12 · Inverness CC - Rudder Mon PM · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with LaTanya Sandy Johnson
loading the estimate
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-10-05 · Inverness CC - Rudder Mon PM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauri Derecki
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-08-31 · Inverness CC - McClanahan · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jill ALEXANDER
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-12 · Inverness CC - McClanahan · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julia Rinks
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-06 · Inverness CC - Rudder · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cindy Hodo
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-31 · Inverness CC - McClanahan · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mallory Carrington
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-30 · Inverness CC - Rudder · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Angelia Spraberry
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-29 · Inverness CC - McClanahan · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Jessup
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-22 · Inverness CC - McClanahan · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julia Rinks
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-16 · Inverness CC - Rudder · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Pamela Holton
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
39.3%
35W–54L · 47.2% of games
6.5
26.7%
4W–11L · 43.5% of games
7.5
32.7%
18W–37L · 43.9% of games
7.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 47.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
72 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
32 matches
#1 Singles
8%
13 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova