← Search

Lauri Derecki

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Birmingham, AL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
146 matches · 66W–80L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history146 matches
L
2026-10-19 · Inverness CC - (Rudder) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Emmerth
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-18 · ICC - Mathis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richard Derecki mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-12 · Inverness CC - (Rudder) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Emmerth
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-05 · Inverness CC - Rudder Mon PM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Lancaster
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-09-28 · Inverness CC - (Rudder) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindy Hodo
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-27 · ICC - Mathis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richard Derecki mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-15 · Inverness CC - Rudder Mon PM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mallory Carrington
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-19 · Inverness CC - Rudder · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with LaTanya Sandy Johnson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-12 · Inverness CC - Rudder · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Melissa Butler
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-03 · Inverness CC - McClanahan · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jill ALEXANDER
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-29 · Inverness CC - McClanahan · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sally McClanahan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-06 · Inverness CC - McClanahan · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ashley Wood
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
53.6%
15W–13L · 50.1% of games
3.5
41.9%
31W–43L · 46.3% of games
6.5
50%
9W–9L · 50.6% of games
7.5
40%
4W–6L · 39.4% of games
3.5mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 37.3% of games
6.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 58.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
44 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
41 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal