← Search

Elizabeth Sellers

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Birmingham, AL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
115 matches · 81W–34L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history115 matches
W
2026-11-01 · West Homewood - Voce/Rich · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Sellers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-10-30 · Homewood - White/Allen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela White
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-10-25 · West Homewood - Voce/Rich · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Sellers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-10-23 · Homewood - White/Allen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela White
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-25 · Homewood - White/Allen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela White
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-09-11 · Homewood - White/Allen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Clark
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-09-04 · Homewood - White/Allen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela White
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-24 · Homewood - Lacey · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sarah Bingham
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-19 · West Homewood - Hollis/Sellers · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katie Hollis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-03 · Homewood - Lacey · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Margaret Lacey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-22 · West Homewood - Hollis/Sellers · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katie Hollis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-20 · Homewood - Lacey · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sarah Bingham
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
66.7%
22W–11L · 55.9% of games
3.0
80.6%
29W–7L · 64.2% of games
3.5
62.5%
10W–6L · 55.7% of games
5.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 64.4% of games
6.5
72.7%
8W–3L · 56.9% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
50%
3W–3L · 44.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
40 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
19 matches
#1 Singles
16%
18 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert