← Search

Kate Gavagan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Grosse Pointe Farms, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
113 matches · 64W–49L · seasons 2017–2026
Match history113 matches
L
2026-10-25 · #3 Doubles · with Michelle Mazur
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-17 · #2 Doubles · with Jocelyn Smith
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-26 · EAST-Kean 8.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Julian Olejnik mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-12 · EAST-Kean 8.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Julian Olejnik mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-08-11 · EAST-Kean 18s 8.0X F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Haines mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-10 · EAST-KEAN 7.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jackson Marchal mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-03 · EAST-Kean 8.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Julian Olejnik mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-17 · EAST-Kean 18s 9.0X F · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sean Miller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-15 · EAST-Monte 18s 4.5 NW F · #1 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-10 · EAST-Zampardo 18s 7.0X F · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Austin Nancarrow mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-06-24 · EAST-Monte 18s 4.5 NW F · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shannon Babcock
loading the estimate
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-23 · BT- Ebert 18s 4.0 NW F3 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marcia Varner
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.5
50%
8W–8L · 55.3% of games
4.0
48.6%
18W–19L · 50.7% of games
4.5
25%
1W–3L · 46.1% of games
8.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
62.5%
10W–6L · 57.6% of games
0.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 62.1% of games
8.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 61% of games
8.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 61.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
19 matches
#1 Singles
16%
18 matches
#2 Singles
7%
8 matches
Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams