← Search

Julian Olejnik

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Clarkston, MI
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
185 matches · 134W–51L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history185 matches
W
2026-10-23 · EAST-Kean 8.5M Weekend Combo F · #1 Doubles · with Tim Lepczyk
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-10-17 · EAST-Kean 8.5M Weekend Combo F · #1 Doubles · with William Segraves
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-31 · EAST-KEAN 7.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Peggy Offerle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-08-29 · EAST-Kean 18s 8.0X F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jocelyn Smith mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-29 · EAST-Kean 18s 8.0X F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jocelyn Smith mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-26 · EAST-Kean 8.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kate Gavagan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-24 · EAST-KEAN 7.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Peggy Offerle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-08-16 · EAST-Kean 18s 5.0M · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Matthew Prigorac championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-12 · EAST-Kean 8.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kate Gavagan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-08-11 · #3 Doubles · 10.0 · with Sienna Osborne mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-08 · EAST-Kean 18s 4.5M F3 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jason Chen championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-05 · EAST-Kean 9.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 9.5 · with Ayumi Sasaki mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level14 levels played
0.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
77.3%
58W–17L · 58.4% of games
5.0
47.1%
8W–9L · 48.5% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5
81.8%
18W–4L · 59.9% of games
9.0
93.3%
14W–1L · 72.3% of games
9.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
0.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
10.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 45.7% of games
7.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 54.8% of games
8.0mixed
60%
9W–6L · 59.2% of games
8.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 54.8% of games
9.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
81 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
24 matches
#1 Singles
10%
19 matches
#2 Singles
8%
15 matches
#3 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal