← Search

Jason Chen

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rochester Hills, MI
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
143 matches · 116W–27L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2026. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history143 matches
W
2026-11-01 · #1 Doubles · with Jeffrey Seilkop
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-10-17 · #1 Doubles · with Austin Nancarrow
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-10-04 · #2 Doubles · with Steven Arens
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-24 · PEACH-DeGuzman 8.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kristine Deguzman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-08-12 · PEACH-DeGuzman 8.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jaclyn Nasir mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-11 · EAST-Kean 18s 9.0X F · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Antonia Burkhard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-08-08 · EAST-Kean 18s 4.5M F3 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Julian Olejnik championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-04 · PEACH-DeGuzman 18s 8.0X F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sheryl Eckert mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-01 · EAST-Kean 18s 4.5M F3 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Derek Sammons championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-15 · EAST-Kean 18s 4.5M F3 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Connor Stafford
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-09 · EAST-Kean 18s 4.5M F3 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Louis Wyre
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-07-01 · EAST-Kean 18s 4.5M F3 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Daniel Huan
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
10.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
87.5%
56W–8L · 63.2% of games
5.0
75%
3W–1L · 47.1% of games
9.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
10.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
73.1%
19W–7L · 59.8% of games
8.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
90%
9W–1L · 65.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
59 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
35 matches
#1 Singles
22%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
11 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches
Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer