← Search

Ana Trsic

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Macomb, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
197 matches · 77W–120L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history197 matches
W
2026-10-17 · #2 Doubles · with Sheryl Eckert
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-11 · PEACH-Palazzolo 4.0W Fall Singles F · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-2
L
2026-10-04 · #2 Doubles · with Noel Bielski
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-31 · PEACH-Mazur 7.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brandon Fitch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-08-26 · PEACH-Mazur 7.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Eric Wheatley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-24 · PEACH-Mazur 7.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brandon Fitch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-17 · PEACH-Mazur 7.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with JUSTIN WHITE mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-08-12 · PEACH-Mazur 7.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brandon Fitch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-04 · PEACH-DeGuzman 18s 8.0X F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Al Itchon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-03 · PEACH-Mazur 7.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brandon Fitch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-06-16 · PEACH-DeGuzman 18s 4.0 NW F3 · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-09 · PEACH-DeGuzman 18s 4.0 NW F3 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jaclyn Nasir
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
3.5
76.9%
10W–3L · 60.2% of games
4.0
14.5%
8W–47L · 39.2% of games
6.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 51.3% of games
7.0
73.3%
11W–4L · 58.9% of games
7.5
53.6%
15W–13L · 48.9% of games
8.0
28.6%
4W–10L · 44% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0
25%
2W–6L · 37.5% of games
7.0mixed
43.8%
7W–9L · 47.4% of games
7.5mixed
50%
3W–3L · 53.8% of games
8.0mixed
42.1%
8W–11L · 48.1% of games
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 22% of the time
#1 Singles
22%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
37 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
32 matches
#2 Singles
14%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
27 matches
Singles
6%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe