← Search

Alison Kirschenbaum

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Birmingham, MI
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
320 matches · 230W–90L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history320 matches
W
2026-10-17 · OHCC-Keranen 40s 4.5 NW F · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kristen Charlton championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-10-17 · OHCC-Keranen 40s 4.5 NW F · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kristen Charlton championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-10-16 · OHCC-Keranen 40s 4.5 NW F · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kristen Charlton championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-16 · OHCC-Keranen 40s 4.5 NW F · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kristen Charlton championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-10-04 · FAC-Keranen 8.5W Weekend Combo F · #2 Doubles · with Lauren Rakolta
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-23 · OHCC-Keranen 40s 4.5 NW F · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kristen Charlton championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-08-22 · OHCC-Keranen 40s 4.5 NW F · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kristen Charlton championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-08-21 · OHCC-Keranen 40s 4.5 NW F · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kristen Charlton championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-21 · OHCC-Keranen 40s 4.5 NW F · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kristen Charlton championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-19 · FAC-Keranen 9.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 9.5 · with Jason Norville mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-08-16 · FAC-Keranen 18s 4.5 NW F · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Moorea McNalley championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-16 · FAC-Keranen 18s 4.5 NW F · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Moorea McNalley championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams62 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
90%
9W–1L · 70.5% of games
4.0
91.7%
22W–2L · 70.6% of games
4.5
77.3%
119W–35L · 61.3% of games
5.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.5
65.2%
15W–8L · 57.7% of games
9.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.5
25%
1W–3L · 51.9% of games
8.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 61.4% of games
9.0mixed
58.1%
43W–31L · 53.1% of games
9.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
157 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
106 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
32 matches
Singles
4%
12 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches
#1 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams