← Search

Heidi Locke Simon

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
DARIEN, CT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
108 matches · 51W–57L · seasons 2018–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2019. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history108 matches
L
2026-10-10 · NC:Mixed Nuts:Locke Simon · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Danne Woo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-09-18 · CP:No Regrets Summer 2026:das Neves/Strating · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah von Glahn championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-09-11 · NC:Mixed Nuts:Locke Simon · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Menzel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-18 · NC:Summer Aces:Gill/Warner · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-3
W
2026-05-31 · CP:No Regrets Summer 2026:das Neves/Strating · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Strating
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-31 · NC:Summer Aces:Gill/Warner · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Carr
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-05-17 · CP:No Regrets Summer 2026:das Neves/Strating · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Albanese
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-03 · NC:Summer Aces:Gill/Warner · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elissa Mellinger
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-24 · NC:Mixed Nuts:Simon · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Menzel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-04 · NC:Wildcards:Warner/Herdeg · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Krongard
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-02-27 · NC:Mixed Nuts:Simon · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rodney Rideout mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-01-08 · NC:Wildcards:Warner/Herdeg · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Hartong
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
48.2%
41W–44L · 50.6% of games
4.0
0%
0W–5L · 24.7% of games
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
46.2%
6W–7L · 52.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
34 matches
#1 Singles
22%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
6%
6 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams