← Search

Donald Scarlett

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Baltimore, MD
3.0S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
29 matches · 8W–21L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history29 matches
L
2026-04-02 · Brookes 6.0 Mixed · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bree Caudill mixed
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-28 · Brookes 6.0 Mixed · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bree Caudill mixed
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
W
Default
2026-01-17 · Brookes 6.0 Mixed · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Trina Culbreath mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-06-02 · Bailey/Rasul · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alan Goodwich
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-04-27 · Bailey/Rasul · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kamran Rasul
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2025-03-16 · Morris and Team · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Manette Zinkand mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2025-02-16 · Morris and Team · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Julie Wenz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2023-06-04 · Brandt · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeanine Parker mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
L
2023-05-21 · Brandt · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Holly Klink mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
2023-05-07 · Brandt · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Rauhofer mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
L
2023-04-30 · Brandt · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeanine Parker mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2023-03-05 · Net Results · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carisa Husak mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
34.8%
8W–15L · 44.3% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 11.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 48% of the time
#2 Doubles
48%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert