← Search

Elizabeth Barker

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Peoria, AZ
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
54 matches · 16W–38L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history54 matches
L
2026-10-15 · 7.0 TTF1 Trilogy Net Assets W65F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Vetter
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-08 · 7.0 TTF1 Trilogy Net Assets W65F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sue Burroughs
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-12-11 · 6.0 STRC Tabar W65F · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rachel Speliopoulos
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-11-29 · 7.0 ATGC Arizona Traditions Terminetters W55F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Hunter
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
W
2025-03-27 · PHX/Tabar/65&O/6.0W · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rachel Speliopoulos
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-03-22 · PHX/Tabar/65&O/6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Diane Vetter
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W
2025-03-20 · PHX/Tabar/65&O/6.0W · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Adrienne Tabar
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-01-30 · PHX/Tabar/65&O/6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Diane Vetter
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2024-05-04 · HotShots Caliente · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Adrienne Tabar
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L
2024-05-03 · HotShots Caliente · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Adrienne Tabar
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2024-04-20 · 7.0 PAS Tabar W55S · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Terrie Sosapavon
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2024-04-13 · 7.0 PAS Tabar W55S · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Adrienne Tabar
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
80%
4W–1L · 58.9% of games
7.0
25.5%
12W–35L · 37.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 50% of the time
#3 Doubles
50%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe