← Search

Lesley Bernal

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Surprise, AZ
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
143 matches · 111W–32L · seasons 2023–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2023. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history143 matches
W
2026-10-27 · 4.0 PTC1 Baking Bad W18F · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Baker
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-10-20 · 4.0 PTC1 Baking Bad W18F · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Baker
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-10-16 · 4.0 STRC2 Feel The Bern X18F · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Trevor Gattis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-13 · 4.0 PTC1 Baking Bad W18F · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Christensen
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-10-02 · 4.0 STRC2 Feel The Bern X18F · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Bernal mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-09-22 · 4.0 PTC1 Baking Bad W18F · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Baker
loading the estimate
0-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-18 · 4.0 STRC2 Feel The Bern X18F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Varun Sathyanarayan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-08 · 4.0 PTC1 Baking Bad W18F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Iris Gordon
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-09-01 · 4.0 PTC1 Baking Bad W18F · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Christensen
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-1
W
2026-08-25 · 4.0 PTC1 Baking Bad W18F · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janet Sauter
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Christensen championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-08-07 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Christensen championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
100%
5W–0L · 81.1% of games
3.0
86.2%
25W–4L · 65.7% of games
3.5
73.2%
30W–11L · 60.1% of games
4.0
71.4%
15W–6L · 59.8% of games
3.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 53.4% of games
6.0mixed
78.6%
11W–3L · 61.5% of games
7.0mixed
77.8%
14W–4L · 62.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
61 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
35 matches
#1 Singles
5%
7 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer