← Search

Janet Sauter

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mesa, AZ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
243 matches · 184W–59L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history243 matches
W
2026-10-27 · 4.0 PTC1 Baking Bad W18F · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kae Lynn Randall
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-10-20 · 4.0 PTC1 Baking Bad W18F · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kae Lynn Randall
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-10-18 · Singles tourney
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
Remi Smit
2026-10-15 · Singles · 4.0 tourney
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-10-15 · Singles · 4.0 tourney
loading the estimate
7-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-13 · 4.0 PTC1 Baking Bad W18F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bethany Lien
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-10-06 · 4.0 PTC1 Baking Bad W18F · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kae Lynn Randall
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-09-22 · 4.0 PTC1 Baking Bad W18F · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kae Lynn Randall
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-09-15 · 4.0 PTC1 Baking Bad W18F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kae Lynn Randall
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-09-08 · 4.0 PTC1 Baking Bad W18F · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kae Lynn Randall
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-09-01 · 4.0 PTC1 Baking Bad W18F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kae Lynn Randall
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-08-25 · 4.0 PTC1 Baking Bad W18F · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lesley Bernal
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.5
45.5%
5W–6L · 56.1% of games
4.0
83.3%
80W–16L · 63.4% of games
4.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 40.1% of games
7.5
68.8%
11W–5L · 59.4% of games
8.5
84.6%
11W–2L · 57% of games
4.0mixed
78.9%
15W–4L · 62.6% of games
4.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
85.3%
29W–5L · 64.7% of games
7.5mixed
75%
6W–2L · 66.2% of games
8.0mixed
69.2%
9W–4L · 62.3% of games
8.5mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 61.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
111 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
76 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
32 matches
Singles
6%
14 matches
#1 Singles
3%
6 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer