← Search

Natalie Batlin

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
San Francisco, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
177 matches · 103W–74L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history177 matches
L
2026-10-31 · SAN CARLOS TC/ARGUELLO PK CW7.5A · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sarah Chai
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-10-30 · TENNIS COALITION SF/GOLDMAN TC CW7.5A-DT · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ieda Garcia
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-25 · SAN CARLOS TC/ARGUELLO PK CW7.5A · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amy Alvarado
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-10-25 · CALIFORNIA TC CW8.5A · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Elizabeth L Krakow
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-16 · SFTC/Lu/San Francisco · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda Geballe
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-16 · SFTC/Lu/San Francisco · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda Geballe
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-15 · SAN CARLOS TC/ARGUELLO PK CW7.5A · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kalina Stephani
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-10-04 · SAN CARLOS TC/ARGUELLO PK CW7.5A · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Juliana Gensheimer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-10-01 · SAN CARLOS TC/ARGUELLO PK CW7.5A · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tracie Luong
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-09-25 · TENNIS COALITION SF/GOLDMAN TC CW7.5A-DT · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ieda Garcia
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-09-18 · TENNIS COALITION SF/GOLDMAN TC CW7.5A-DT · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mimi Fichter
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-09-15 · CALIFORNIA TC CW8.5A · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Linda Geballe
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams55 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
64.3%
9W–5L · 55.8% of games
3.5
59.5%
22W–15L · 60.4% of games
4.0
54.2%
32W–27L · 51.9% of games
6.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 50.9% of games
7.5
71.9%
23W–9L · 58.1% of games
8.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 49.4% of games
7.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 51.1% of games
8.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 47.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
71 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
37 matches
#1 Singles
18%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
28 matches
#2 Singles
6%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova