← Search

Linda Geballe

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
San Francisco, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
181 matches · 118W–63L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history181 matches
W
2026-10-30 · TENNIS COALITION SF/GOLDMAN TC CW7.5A-DT · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Leslie Doohan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-10-25 · SAN CARLOS TC/ARGUELLO PK CW7.5A · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Randi Ismailer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-10-20 · SAN CARLOS TC/ARGUELLO PK CW7.5A · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Pam Dineva
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 0-6
W
2026-10-18 · SAN CARLOS TC/ARGUELLO PK CW7.5A · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Pam Dineva
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-10-16 · SFTC/Lu/San Francisco · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Natalie Batlin
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-16 · SFTC/Lu/San Francisco · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Natalie Batlin
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-15 · TENNIS COALITION SF/GOLDMAN TC CW7.5A-DT · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sarah Ehler
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-10-09 · TENNIS COALITION SF/GOLDMAN TC CW7.5A-DT · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Paula Mangin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-10-04 · SAN CARLOS TC/ARGUELLO PK CW7.5A · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sara Singerman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-09-18 · TENNIS COALITION SF/GOLDMAN TC CW7.5A-DT · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary Anne Ruyle
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-09-15 · CALIFORNIA TC CW8.5A · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Natalie Batlin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-5
L
2026-09-10 · TENNIS COALITION SF/GOLDMAN TC CW7.5A-DT · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sarah Ehler
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams60 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
100%
5W–0L · 78.9% of games
3.5
71.4%
30W–12L · 59.3% of games
4.0
70.3%
45W–19L · 56.9% of games
6.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 68.6% of games
7.5
51.4%
19W–18L · 50.7% of games
8.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 54.2% of games
8.0mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 49.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
39 matches
#1 Singles
14%
26 matches
#2 Singles
8%
15 matches
Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams