← Search

Sharon Spangler

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
PASADENA, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
202 matches · 65W–137L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history202 matches
L
2026-11-01 · SGV Queens of the Court-Yu-Arroyo Seco/SU4 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Hall
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-10-16 · SGV Team Arroyo Seco-Jones-Arroyo SecoF12:30 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Teryl Murphy
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-10-09 · SGV Team Arroyo Seco-Jones-Arroyo SecoF12:30 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Penny Penniston
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-26 · SGV Queens of the Court-Jones-Arroyo Seco/SU4 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rima Zobayan
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-15 · SGV Team Arroyo Seco-Yu-Arroyo Seco/T12:30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amirah Noaman
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-26 · SGV Triple Match Point-Spangler-Arroyo Seco/SU12 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Patricia Francisco
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-19 · SGV Triple Match Point-Spangler-Arroyo Seco/SU12 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrea Fruits
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-28 · SGV Queens of the Court-Yu-Arroyo Seco/SU4 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Hall
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-13 · SGV Queens of the Court-Jones-Arroyo Seco/SU4 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Eliza Llobrera
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-31 · SGV Queens of the Court-Jones-Arroyo Seco/SU4 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Biales
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-30 · SGV Queens of the Court-Yu-Arroyo Seco/SU4 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amirah Noaman
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-17 · SGV Queens of the Court-Jones-Arroyo Seco/SU4 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christiana Liu
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams74 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
30%
3W–7L · 38.4% of games
3.0
38.9%
14W–22L · 47.2% of games
3.5
33.3%
39W–78L · 43.3% of games
4.0
11.8%
2W–15L · 31.6% of games
7.0
35.7%
5W–9L · 40.7% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 20% of games
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 50.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
80 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
70 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
50 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer