← Search

Andrea Fruits

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Glendale, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
228 matches · 126W–102L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history228 matches
L
2026-10-17 · Mixed Acers/Tsai-Amirganian/CSUN · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hrag Kopooshian mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-11 · SGV Queens of the Court-Yu-Arroyo Seco/SU4 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marisa Oh
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-09-27 · Mixed Acers/Tsai-Amirganian/CSUN · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rahul Chhablani mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-09-20 · SGV Triple Match Point-Spangler-Arroyo Seco/SU12 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Eliza Llobrera
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-19 · SGV Triple Match Point-Spangler-Arroyo Seco/SU12 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Patricia Francisco
loading the estimate
7-5, 5-4
L
2026-09-19 · SGV Queens of the Court-Yu-Arroyo Seco/SU4 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Jayasekera
loading the estimate
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-13 · SGV Queens of the Court-Jones-Arroyo Seco/SU4 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carly Vong
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-09-12 · SGV Queens of the Court-Yu-Arroyo Seco/SU4 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marisa Oh
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-08-22 · Mixed Acers/Tsai-Amirganian/CSUN · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rahul Chhablani mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-09 · SGV Triple Match Point-Spangler-Arroyo Seco/SU12 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amirah Noaman
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-08-08 · SGV Triple Match Point-Spangler-Arroyo Seco/SU12 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with DARCELIA WILSON
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-19 · SGV Triple Match Point-Spangler-Arroyo Seco/SU12 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sharon Spangler
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams79 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
71.9%
92W–36L · 58.4% of games
3.5
30.2%
13W–30L · 42.5% of games
6.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
10%
1W–9L · 32.6% of games
3.0mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 45.5% of games
7.0mixed
38.7%
12W–19L · 45.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
94 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
63 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
60 matches
#2 Singles
3%
6 matches
#1 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova