← Search

DARCELIA WILSON

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
San Gabriel, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
121 matches · 57W–64L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history121 matches
W
2026-10-24 · SGV Queens of the Court-Jones-Arroyo Seco/SU4 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rima Zobayan
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-16 · SGV Team Arroyo Seco-Jones-Arroyo SecoF12:30 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amirah Noaman
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
Default
2026-10-13 · SGV Team Arroyo Seco-Yu-Arroyo Seco/T12:30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amirah Noaman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-10-09 · SGV Team Arroyo Seco-Jones-Arroyo SecoF12:30 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Trecia Mendoza
loading the estimate
0-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-02 · SGV Team Arroyo Seco-Jones-Arroyo SecoF12:30 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Patricia Francisco
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-09-30 · SGV Team Arroyo Seco-Yu-Arroyo Seco/T12:30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sophia Chang
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-09-25 · SGV Team Arroyo Seco-Jones-Arroyo SecoF12:30 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amirah Noaman
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-18 · SGV Team Arroyo Seco-Jones-Arroyo SecoF12:30 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amirah Noaman
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-09-13 · SGV Triple Match Point-Spangler-Arroyo Seco/SU12 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amirah Noaman
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-08 · SGV Triple Match Point-Spangler-Arroyo Seco/SU12 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrea Fruits
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-13 · SGV Queens of the Court-Jones-Arroyo Seco/SU4 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Trecia Mendoza
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-06-13 · SGV Queens of the Court-Yu-Arroyo Seco/SU4 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley Parker
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
53.9%
48W–41L · 53.8% of games
3.5
28.6%
8W–20L · 42.5% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 31% of the time
#3 Doubles
31%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
22 matches
#1 Singles
17%
20 matches
#2 Singles
10%
12 matches
#3 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova