← Search

Meredith Miles

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Richmond, VA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
108 matches · 41W–67L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history108 matches
L
2026-09-09 · WOCC Stringer 3.5 WeekDay · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jenefer Williams
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-29 · WOCC Stringer 3.5 WeekDay · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Berry
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-19 · WOCC Stringer 3.5 WeekDay · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandy Pisano
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-29 · WOCC Stringer 3.5 WeekDay · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Berry
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-07-20 · WOCC Sampson · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelly Gregory
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-15 · 20 Willow Oaks Stringer · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Mathe
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-08 · 20 Willow Oaks Stringer · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Berry
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-29 · WOCC Sampson · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kimberly Giancaspro
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-06-24 · 20 Willow Oaks Stringer · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Berry
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-22 · WOCC Sampson · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelly Gregory
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-23 · WOCC Crowell · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Kennedy
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-04-04 · WOCC Crowell · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Giancaspro
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
42.6%
20W–27L · 47.6% of games
4.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 40.2% of games
6.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 51.9% of games
7.0
28.6%
4W–10L · 43.2% of games
7.5
40%
4W–6L · 42.8% of games
8.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
28.6%
4W–10L · 44.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 46% of the time
#3 Doubles
46%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
25 matches
#2 Female Doubles
3%
3 matches
#3 Female Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova