← Search

Kimberly Ross

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Manakin Sabot, VA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
201 matches · 115W–86L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history201 matches
W
2026-09-09 · HCC Stinson/Berents · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Frazier
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-09-02 · HCC Stinson/Berents · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Poulos
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-24 · HCC Stinson/Berents · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Poulos
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Default
2026-08-21 · HCC Stinson/Berents · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Mugford
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-14 · HCC-Yablonski 3.5 WKEND · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Broughton
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-04-25 · HCC-Yablonski 3.5 WKEND · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sidney Mayer
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-18 · HCC-Yablonski 3.5 WKEND · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Renee Fisher
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-04 · HCC-Yablonski 3.5 WKEND · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alex Mendez
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2025-11-24 · HCC Stinson/Orski 7.5 Combo · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amery Whitby
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-11-23 · Hermitage Thompson · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jospeh Ross mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2025-11-19 · HCC Stinson/Orski 7.5 Combo · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amery Whitby
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-11-18 · Hermitage - Fisher · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kelsey Royster
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams68 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level14 levels played
2.5
76.5%
13W–4L · 64% of games
3.0
70.6%
12W–5L · 58.9% of games
3.5
66.7%
48W–24L · 55.2% of games
4.0
21.4%
3W–11L · 35.7% of games
5.5
50%
5W–5L · 51.3% of games
6.5
100%
6W–0L · 66.1% of games
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 52.7% of games
8.0
40%
2W–3L · 43.8% of games
5.5mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 40.7% of games
6.0mixed
50%
7W–7L · 50.8% of games
6.5mixed
40%
4W–6L · 44.6% of games
7.0mixed
41.7%
5W–7L · 48.2% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 29% of the time
#3 Doubles
29%
59 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
58 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
31 matches
#2 Singles
11%
23 matches
#1 Singles
10%
21 matches
#3 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer