← Search

Sally Boland

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Decatur, IL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
296 matches · 166W–130L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history296 matches
W
2026-10-03 · MSIL 3.0/3.5/4.0W Tri-Level Hogan-Decatur · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Jackson
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-10-03 · MSIL 3.0/3.5/4.0W Tri-Level Hogan-Decatur · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Noelle Ratliff
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-09-26 · MSIL 3.0/3.5/4.0W Tri-Level Hogan-Decatur · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lucy List
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-13 · MSIL 3.0/3.5/4.0W Tri-Level Hogan-Decatur · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Jackson
loading the estimate
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-13 · MSIL 3.0/3.5/4.0W Tri-Level Hogan-Decatur · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Noelle Ratliff
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-23 · MSIL Mixed 18&O 7.0 Vanhootegem-Decatur · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Ballinger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-23 · MSIL Mixed 18&O 7.0 Vanhootegem-Decatur · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Ballinger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-08-19 · MSIL A55&O 8.0W Novitsky-Champaign · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susie Howe
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-10 · MSIL Mixed 18&O 7.0 Vanhootegem-Decatur · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Ballinger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-08-05 · MSIL A55&O 8.0W Novitsky-Champaign · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Molly Tracy
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-08-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Jackson championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-01 · MSIL Mixed 18&O 7.0 Vanhootegem-Decatur · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Ballinger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams77 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
3.5
60%
33W–22L · 54.3% of games
4.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 53.8% of games
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 55.4% of games
7.0
30%
3W–7L · 45.2% of games
7.5
51.9%
28W–26L · 50.2% of games
8.0
25%
2W–6L · 41.8% of games
0.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
90%
9W–1L · 62.9% of games
6.5mixed
61.5%
8W–5L · 61.3% of games
7.0mixed
62.4%
58W–35L · 55.5% of games
7.5mixed
40%
12W–18L · 47.8% of games
8.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 45.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
125 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
88 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
81 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams