← Search

Susie Howe

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bloomington, IL
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
109 matches · 57W–52L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history109 matches
W
2026-10-18 · MSIL 9.0 Mixed 55&O Totten-Bloomington · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Matt Heimstead mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-08-19 · MSIL A55&O 8.0W Novitsky-Champaign · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sally Boland
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-12 · MSIL A55&O 8.0W Novitsky-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marla Golden
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-29 · MSIL Mixed 18&O 8.0 Harmon-Bloomington · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Erik Siembab mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-26 · MSIL Mixed 18&O 8.0 Harmon-Bloomington · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lijian Zhang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · MSIL 9.0 Mixed 40&O Evergreen · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Charbel Saliba mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-05-30 · MSIL 4.5W Tri-Level Howe-Bloomington · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lisa Wegner
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-17 · MSIL 4.5W Tri-Level Howe-Bloomington · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lisa Wegner
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-17 · MSIL 4.5W Tri-Level Howe-Bloomington · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Paige McNamara
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-26 · MSIL 4.5W Tri-Level Howe-Bloomington · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Paige McNamara
loading the estimate
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-19 · MSIL 4.5W Tri-Level Howe-Bloomington · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cassie Collins
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-19 · MSIL 4.5W Tri-Level Howe-Bloomington · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Paige McNamara
loading the estimate
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
66%
35W–18L · 59.3% of games
4.5
42.9%
9W–12L · 46.7% of games
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
78.6%
11W–3L · 58.4% of games
9.0mixed
10.5%
2W–17L · 35% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 64% of the time
#1 Doubles
64%
70 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
13 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams