← Search

Tami Lockard

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Navarre, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
37 matches · 24W–13L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history37 matches
L
2025-04-09 · Elliott - RS Clay · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristyn Miller
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2025-03-19 · Elliott - RS Clay · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marina Agadzi
loading the estimate
0-6, 5-7
L
2025-03-05 · Elliott - RS Clay · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debbie Cook
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
W
2023-12-14 · Bryan - RS Clay · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Van Hughes
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 7-5
L
2023-11-16 · Bryan - RS Clay · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Denise Wilson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2022-04-21 · Bryan - RS Clay · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tonna Wheat
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2022-03-31 · Bryan - RS Clay · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Donna Madison
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2022-03-17 · Bryan - RS Clay · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Van Hughes
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2022-03-10 · Bryan - RS Clay · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Van Hughes
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2021-09-28 · Chapman - SHL · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jeshua Reddecliff
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2021-09-07 · Chapman - SHL · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jeshua Reddecliff
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
L
2021-08-31 · Chapman - SHL · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Elizabeth Elliott
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
81.8%
18W–4L · 63.6% of games
4.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 41.4% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer