← Search

Matthew Sembrat

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Pittsburgh, PA
3.5M year-end 2024
i
Mixed Exclusive — this player’s rating comes only from mixed play
44 matches · 17W–27L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history44 matches
W
2025-03-17 · Court Jesters · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dawn Beighey mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-03-02 · Court Jesters · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Jenkins mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
L
2024-03-17 · Tightly Strung · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Jenkins mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-7
L
2024-02-25 · Tightly Strung · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Erin Sass mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
W
2024-02-18 · Tightly Strung · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shirley McElhattan mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-2
W
2024-02-04 · Tightly Strung · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maryanne Pacconi mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2024-01-28 · Tightly Strung · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dawn Beighey mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2023-12-16 · Aceing Gracefully · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maryanne Pacconi mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
W
2023-12-03 · Aceing Gracefully · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maryanne Pacconi mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 6-1, 7-5
L
2023-11-11 · Aceing Gracefully · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maryanne Pacconi mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2023-11-04 · Aceing Gracefully · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Jenkins mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
L
2023-10-08 · Aceing Gracefully · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Jenkins mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
7.0mixed
38.6%
17W–27L · 42.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 52% of the time
#2 Doubles
52%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal