← Search

Maryanne Pacconi

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Pittsburgh, PA
3.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
36 matches · 10W–26L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history36 matches
W
2026-10-25 · Playmakers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Moses mixed
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-03-05 · The Mt Lebanon Mix Ups · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Douglas Wright mixed
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-5
L
2026-02-22 · Playmakers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Moses mixed
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-14 · Playmakers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Moses mixed
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-13 · The Mt Lebanon Mix Ups · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Charles Kubiniec mixed
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-07 · Playmakers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Moses mixed
loading the estimate
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-11-23 · Playmakers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Moses mixed
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-7, 0-1
L
2025-11-08 · Playmakers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Moses mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-2, 1-3
L
2025-10-26 · Playmakers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Moses mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2024-03-10 · Tightly Strung · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Consiglio mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 5-7
W
2024-02-04 · Tightly Strung · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Sembrat mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2024-01-14 · Tightly Strung · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Charron mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
25%
1W–3L · 37.3% of games
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 51% of games
7.0mixed
21.7%
5W–18L · 37.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
8 matches
#1 Singles
6%
2 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match
#4 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal