← Search

David Clark

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Salem, OR
3.0S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
31 matches · 17W–14L · seasons 2016–2021
Match history31 matches
L
2021-09-17 · STSC-Clark · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lawrence Salmony championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2021-09-17 · STSC-Clark · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lawrence Salmony championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 3-6
L
2021-06-27 · STSC-Clark · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Krishnan Seshadri championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
W
2021-06-25 · STSC-Clark · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Krishnan Seshadri championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
W
2021-06-24 · STSC-Clark · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Krishnan Seshadri championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2020-11-01 · STSC-Clark · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Cherry
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 7-6
W
2020-10-11 · STSC-Clark · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Cherry
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
L
2020-10-04 · STSC-Clark · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Barlow
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
W
2020-09-27 · STSC-Clark · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Cherry
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
W
2019-11-24 · STSC Clark 7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kevin Fisher
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
L
2019-11-16 · STSC Clark · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Cherry
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
L
2019-11-12 · STSC Clark 7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with William Garcia
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2019–2021
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
6.0
61.5%
16W–10L · 56.3% of games
7.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 45% of the time
#3 Doubles
45%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
7 matches
Singles
10%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams