← Search

Alex Harbell

Kalama, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
180 matches · 127W–53L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Alex Harbell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history180 matches
L
2026-06-14 · VTC-Martin · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Huy Tran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-05-16 · VTC-Martin · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nick Redwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-03 · VTC-Martin · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Francisco Rivera-Giusti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-04-24 · VTC-Martin · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marcelo Diversi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-05 · VTC-Martin · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nick Redwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-03 · VTC-Martin · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marcelo Diversi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-03-08 · PTC-Larsen/Ellsworth · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nick Redwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-01 · PTC-Larsen/Ellsworth · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nick Redwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-02-21 · PTC-Larsen/Ellsworth · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marcelo Diversi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-01-30 · PTC-Larsen/Ellsworth · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nick Redwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-01-24 · PTC-Larsen/Ellsworth · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nick Redwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-01-18 · PTC-Larsen/Ellsworth · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nick Redwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2012–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
77.4%
41W–12L · 60% of games
4.0
42.5%
17W–23L · 47.3% of games
6.0mixed
75%
15W–5L · 60.8% of games
7.0mixed
90.6%
29W–3L · 65% of games
8.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 63.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
91 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
33 matches
#1 Singles
4%
8 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King