← Search

Melissa Kirby

— year-end
76 matches · 44W–32L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Melissa Kirby to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history76 matches
W
2026-09-03 · Johnson/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Roseanne Gardner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-09-01 · Kirby/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Liz Mcclain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-24 · Johnson/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Roseanne Gardner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-15 · Kirby/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jennifer Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-22 · Fields/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Holly Tucker-Vance
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-05-18 · Kirby4.0 18+/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Liz Mcclain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-05-15 · Fields/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Liz Mcclain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-08 · Fields/Knoxville · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Liz Mcclain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-04 · Kirby4.0 18+/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Liz Mcclain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
Sheri Kilbey / Christina Johnson
2025-11-18 · Kirby/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Liz Mcclain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-11-04 · Kirby/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Liz Mcclain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
HAILEY NEDS / Emily Jenkins
2025-10-21 · Kirby/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Holly Tucker-Vance
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-7, 1-0
Teams60 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
66%
35W–18L · 55.4% of games
4.5
60%
3W–2L · 49% of games
7.5
50%
4W–4L · 53.1% of games
8.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 41.9% of games
4.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 44.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams