← Search

Emily Elison

KNOXVILLE, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
287 matches · 172W–115L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Emily Elison to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history287 matches
W
2026-08-24 · FullerLuna/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Collins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
Morgan Smith / Debi English
2026-08-16 · FullerLuna/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shawni Eaker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
Katie Buehler / Suzanne Miller
2026-08-15 · King/knoxville · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Georgia Rae Rainer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
Jennifer Johnson / Melissa Kirby
2026-08-15 · Gingrich/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lisa Perkey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-18 · Gosselin 18/KNOXVILLE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mike McCarty mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-17 · Gosselin 40s/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paul McLendon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-15 · Gosselin 40s/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paul McLendon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-02 · Gosselin 18/KNOXVILLE · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paul McLendon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-28 · Gosselin 40s/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paul McLendon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-6
L
Catherine Pietsch / Ellen Gooden
2026-06-21 · #1 Doubles · with Kristin Monge championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
Maria Schoonover
2026-06-20 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
Megan Toms / Adrienne Herbek
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Kristin Monge championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams72 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
3.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 63.6% of games
3.5
74.7%
65W–22L · 59.7% of games
4.0
38.1%
16W–26L · 46.7% of games
6.5
53.8%
21W–18L · 56.3% of games
7.5
66.7%
24W–12L · 55.4% of games
8.5
75%
3W–1L · 53.2% of games
0.0mixed
20%
2W–8L · 32.3% of games
3.5mixed
100%
8W–0L · 69.6% of games
4.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 52.5% of games
6.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 56.2% of games
7.0mixed
72.2%
13W–5L · 55.2% of games
8.0mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 42.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
91 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
77 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
58 matches
#1 Singles
9%
27 matches
#2 Singles
6%
17 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert