← Search

Matt Kim

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Chandler, AZ
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
155 matches · 97W–58L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history155 matches
W
2026-10-24 · 3.5 PTC8 Fellowship M55F · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Glenn Stutz
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-30 · 3.5 PAS Global Syndicate M40S · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Keith Taylor
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-23 · 3.5 PAS Global Syndicate M40S · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Fabela
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-03-16 · 3.5 PAS Global Syndicate M40S · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott van Vleet
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-02-16 · 3.5 PAS Global Syndicate M40S · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott van Vleet
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-02-09 · 3.5 PAS Global Syndicate M40S · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Himanshu Kohli
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
W
2025-04-10 · 3.5 MVTC Topspin Terrors M18S · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alex Fernandez
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-04-09 · PHX/PowellSteele/40&O/3.5M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Glenn Stutz
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-04-08 · 3.5 MVTC Topspin Terrors M18S · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sjaak van der Geest
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
W
2025-04-03 · 3.5 MVTC Topspin Terrors M18S · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alex Fernandez
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-03-31 · PHX/PowellSteele/40&O/3.5M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Forrest Hamon
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
W
2025-03-27 · 3.5 MVTC Topspin Terrors M18S · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alex Fernandez
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
60.2%
80W–53L · 54.9% of games
4.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
82.4%
14W–3L · 58.8% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
55 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
37 matches
#1 Singles
20%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
23 matches
#2 Singles
6%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova