← Search

Salvatore Craprotta

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Macomb, MI
3.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
27 matches · 9W–18L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history27 matches
W
2026-11-01 · PEACH-Hoch 6.0X 55&O F · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amy Leonetti mixed
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-10-25 · PEACH-Hoch 6.0X 55&O F · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amy Leonetti mixed
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-04 · PEACH-Hoch 6.0X 55&O F · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amy Leonetti mixed
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-11-09 · 3PEACH-Gaines 7.0 X 55&0 F2 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Rusu mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-10-05 · 3PEACH-Gaines 7.0 X 55&0 F2 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janice Fitch mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-1
L
2024-12-15 · 6PEACH-GAINES 70X 55&O SEM F1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Macko mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 2-6
W
2024-11-03 · 6PEACH-GAINES 70X 55&O SEM F1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robyn Parrott mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2024-10-06 · 6PEACH-GAINES 70X 55&O SEM F1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Macko mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 5-7
L
2024-03-17 · 3PEACH-GAINES 7.0 MIXED 40&O SEM F2 · #3 Doubles · with Jan Synk mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
L
2024-03-10 · 3PEACH-GAINES 7.0 MIXED 40&O SEM F2 · #2 Doubles · with Christine Nathman-Parisi mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
W
2023-12-03 · 5PEACH-GAINES 7.0 MIXED 55&OVER SEM F2 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joanne Gaines mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-1
L
2023-11-05 · 5PEACH-GAINES 7.0 MIXED 55&OVER SEM F2 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Macko mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
36.8%
7W–12L · 46.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe