← Search

Sharon Maurno

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
South Miami, FL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
85 matches · 29W–56L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history85 matches
W
2026-10-28 · Picard (Coral Pine) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Danielle MacDougall
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-28 · Picard (Coral Pine) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beth Lang
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-14 · Picard (Coral Pine) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Levy
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-08-31 · Picard (Coral Pine) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Levy
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-08-11 · Net Chix at Coral Reef · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jennie Cohn
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-09 · Net Chix at Coral Reef · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Erin Fox
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-12 · Coral Reef Park (Picard) · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Lang
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-04-28 · Coral Reef Park (Picard) · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicky Goldner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-04-22 · Picard (Coral Pine) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Danielle MacDougall
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-04-13 · Picard (Coral Pine) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Danielle MacDougall
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-03-30 · Picard (Coral Pine) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Danielle MacDougall
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-02-10 · Coral Reef Park (Picard) · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Ana Gutierrez
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
40.7%
22W–32L · 46.9% of games
3.5
33.3%
5W–10L · 48.9% of games
4.0
0%
0W–4L · 29.2% of games
5.5
25%
2W–6L · 35.5% of games
6.5
0%
0W–4L · 36.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
18 matches
#1 Female Doubles
11%
9 matches
#2 Female Doubles
6%
5 matches
#3 Female Doubles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe