← Search

Danielle MacDougall

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Palmetto Bay, FL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
72 matches · 24W–48L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history72 matches
W
2026-10-28 · Picard (Coral Pine) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sharon Maurno
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-28 · Net Chix at Coral Reef · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Mary Cagle
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-07-08 · Net Chix at Coral Reef · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Mary Cagle
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-30 · Net Chix at Coral Reef · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Aleesa Adams
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-04-22 · Picard (Coral Pine) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sharon Maurno
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-04-13 · Picard (Coral Pine) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sharon Maurno
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-03-30 · Picard (Coral Pine) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sharon Maurno
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-17 · Picard (Coral Pine) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beth Lang
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-09 · Picard (Coral Pine) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Levy
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-23 · Picard (Coral Pine) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hannah Standiford
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-01-20 · Picard (Coral Pine) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Voell
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-11-03 · Picard (Coral Pine) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Voell
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
34.4%
21W–40L · 45.3% of games
5.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 40.1% of games
6.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
19 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova