← Search

Stephanie Voell

Pinecrest, FL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
122 matches · 63W–59L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Stephanie Voell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history122 matches
W
2026-08-18 · Shores Summer Slammers · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Estefania Mai
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-29 · Shores Summer Slammers · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Gail Zvijac
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-07-22 · Shores Summer Slammers · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mary Cordero
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-06-10 · Shores Summer Slammers · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Gail Zvijac
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-09 · Net Chix at Coral Reef · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Antonine Kaiser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-08 · Pazos (Coral Oaks) · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-05 · Coral Oaks (Fabry) · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Cohen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-01 · Pazos (Coral Oaks) · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-04-28 · Coral Oaks (Fabry) · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Cohen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-24 · Pazos (Coral Oaks) · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-22 · Picard (Coral Pine) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hannah Standiford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-04-21 · Coral Oaks (Fabry) · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Cohen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
61.2%
30W–19L · 51.3% of games
3.5
42.3%
22W–30L · 46.2% of games
4.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 57.5% of games
5.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 42.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 25% of the time
#1 Doubles
25%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
18 matches
#2 Female Doubles
13%
16 matches
#1 Singles
10%
12 matches
#1 Female Doubles
7%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe