← Search

Hannah Standiford

Miami, FL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
75 matches · 37W–38L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Hannah Standiford to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history75 matches
L
2026-08-31 · Picard (Coral Pine) · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-28 · Net Chix at Coral Reef · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Judith Luck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-07-08 · Net Chix at Coral Reef · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Felicia Gould
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-30 · Net Chix at Coral Reef · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Erin Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-09 · Net Chix at Coral Reef · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Aleesa Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-22 · Picard (Coral Pine) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Voell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-04-13 · Picard (Coral Pine) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Inmaculada Clariana
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-03-30 · Picard (Coral Pine) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Esther Copeland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-28 · Picard (Coral Pine) · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-23 · Picard (Coral Pine) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Levy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-03-17 · Picard (Coral Pine) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maribel Guenaga-Gonzalez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-03-09 · Picard (Coral Pine) · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
48.5%
33W–35L · 50.1% of games
5.5
50%
2W–2L · 46.8% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
12 matches
#2 Singles
9%
7 matches
#1 Singles
5%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe