← Search

Inmaculada Clariana

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
South Miami, FL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
173 matches · 91W–82L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history173 matches
L
2026-10-16 · Fernandez (Salvadore Park) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ana Fernandez
loading the estimate
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-10-09 · Fernandez (Salvadore Park) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ana Fernandez
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-05 · Picard (Coral Pine) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindsey Katz
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-09-25 · Fernandez (Salvadore Park) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beth DeCamp
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-09-18 · Fernandez (Salvadore Park) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Luanne Schulz
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-18 · Shores Summer Slammers · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Teresa Roades
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-12 · Shores Summer Slammers · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mary Maxwell
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-17 · Shores Summer Slammers · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Hanna Bared
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-04-13 · Picard (Coral Pine) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hannah Standiford
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-04-10 · Fernandez (Salvadore Park) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beth DeCamp
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-04-06 · Fernandez (Salvadore Park) · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-03-30 · Picard (Coral Pine) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gae Shapiro
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
53.1%
78W–69L · 52.7% of games
3.5
0%
0W–5L · 18.9% of games
4.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 53% of games
6.5
50%
3W–3L · 56.2% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 28% of the time
#2 Doubles
28%
49 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
28 matches
#1 Singles
16%
27 matches
#2 Singles
6%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova