← Search

Esther Copeland

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Palmetto Bay, FL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
62 matches · 31W–31L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history62 matches
L
2026-06-30 · Net Chix at Coral Reef · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Felicia Gould
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-05 · Royal Palm (Jupiter) · #3 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Isabelle Whitfield
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-04-22 · Picard (Coral Pine) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Levy
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-21 · Royal Palm (Jupiter) · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Johnnides
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
W
Default
2026-04-13 · Picard (Coral Pine) · #2 Singles · 3.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-03-30 · Picard (Coral Pine) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hannah Standiford
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-24 · Royal Palm (Jupiter) · #4 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Sophia Ponomarenko
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-12-02 · Royal Palm (Jupiter) · #4 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela Thomas
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 0-1
W
2025-11-18 · Royal Palm (Jupiter) · #4 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Jupiter
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-11-10 · Picard (Coral Pine) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Fiorella Warger
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-11-05 · Picard (Coral Pine) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beth Lang
loading the estimate
0-1, 0-0
L
2025-11-04 · Royal Palm (Jupiter) · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Debbie Downey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
54.3%
19W–16L · 49.1% of games
3.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 44.6% of games
5.5
56.2%
9W–7L · 51.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 45% of the time
#3 Doubles
45%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
20 matches
#4 Female Doubles
7%
4 matches
#3 Female Doubles
5%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
3%
2 matches
#2 Female Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal