← Search

Claudia van Essen

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Coral Gables, FL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
104 matches · 41W–63L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history104 matches
W
Esther Copeland / Isabelle Whitfield
2026-05-05 · Coral Oaks (Fabry) · #3 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Adrianne Mittentag
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-04-28 · Coral Oaks (Fabry) · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Adrianne Mittentag
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-04-21 · Coral Oaks (Fabry) · #3 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Adrianne Mittentag
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-04-16 · Coral Oaks (Fabry) · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Adrianne Mittentag
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-28 · Picard (Coral Pine) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gae Shapiro
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-03-10 · Coral Oaks (Fabry) · #3 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Adrianne Mittentag
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-02-24 · Coral Oaks (Fabry) · #3 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Adrianne Mittentag
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-02-05 · Coral Oaks (Fabry) · #3 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Adrianne Mittentag
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-01-20 · Picard (Coral Pine) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carole Bernstein
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-12-02 · Coral Oaks (Fabry) · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Elise Benkard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-11-18 · Coral Oaks (Fabry) · #4 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Balter
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2025-11-10 · Picard (Coral Pine) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hannah Standiford
loading the estimate
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
35.7%
10W–18L · 47.5% of games
3.5
39.1%
18W–28L · 44.8% of games
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 53.4% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
36.4%
8W–14L · 40.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
16 matches
#4 Doubles
13%
13 matches
#1 Female Doubles
7%
7 matches
#3 Female Doubles
5%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer