Teams

Picard (Coral Pine)

2026 MIAMIDADE Adult 18 & Over - ESL Fall Night · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

18 players · average NTRP 2.95 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-10vs Coral Reef Court CrushersWon 32
L#1 DoublesClaudia van Essen / Hannah Standiford vs Didi Montiel / Jessica Rojas6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesIzabella Victores vs Rai Montero1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarole Bernstein / Nelly Foreiter vs Cassandra Sosa / Mary Cagle6-4, 6-4
L#2 SinglesSharon MacIvor vs Tatiana Lindenberg1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesFiorella Warger / Esther Copeland vs Jackie Thayer / Isabel Montejo6-4, 6-4
L#1 DoublesGae Shapiro / Hannah Standiford vs Mary Maxwell / Kristen Socorro1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesIzabella Victores vs Oana Lacrima Ciorbea1-0, 0-0
L#2 DoublesCarole Bernstein / Nelly Foreiter vs Kimberley Martinez / Francesca Morello2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesFelicia Gould vs Mary Cordero3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesEsther Copeland / Beth Lang vs Andrea Montero / Melissa Viana0-1, 0-0
2025-11-05vs Taco TennisSplit 22
W#1 DoublesStephanie Voell / Hannah Standiford vs Bobbie Garrison / Ellie Goralnick6-3, 6-6
L#1 SinglesIzabella Victores vs Debora JAMES6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesGae Shapiro / Nelly Foreiter vs Ana Simon / Veronica Flores7-5, 6-2
L#2 SinglesSharon MacIvor vs Isabella Rendon0-6, 0-6
2025-11-03vs Ferrari (Alper JCC)Lost 23
L#1 DoublesGae Shapiro / Beth Lang vs Lissette Uribe / Melissa Colon Rodriguez2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesHannah Standiford vs Karen Marshall3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDanielle MacDougall / Stephanie Voell vs Susana Sowinski Castillo / Chie-Mie Chyung6-4, 6-3
L#2 SinglesSharon MacIvor vs Andreina Farfan2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesCarole Bernstein / Nelly Foreiter vs Margaret Shanti / Martha Dezayas6-2, 6-2
2025-10-27vs TeamForman2 at Riviera PrepLost 14
L#1 DoublesSharon Maurno / Gae Shapiro vs Monica Mendoza / Brittney Barreto Sunset1-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesIzabella Victores vs Sonjia Kenya4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCarole Bernstein / Nelly Foreiter vs Jannelle Chaviano / Mariela Fuentes1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 SinglesHannah Standiford vs Alessia Fornoni7-5, 7-6
L#3 DoublesBeth Lang / Helen Picard vs Katherine Hernandez / Elizabeta Dimkova6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2025-09-29vs Crandon CranesLost 23
W#1 DoublesInmaculada Clariana / Hannah Standiford vs Maria Albacarys / Lilie Matia6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesIzabella Victores vs Wendy Hu1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDanielle MacDougall / Gae Shapiro vs Rosalyn Blanco / Nereyda Gonzalez6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesFelicia Gould vs Christina Livas3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSharon Maurno / Nancy Levy vs Raquel Mahomar / Maria Salas2-6, 2-6
2025-09-22vs TeamForman at Riviera PrepLost 05
L#1 DoublesStephanie Voell / Inmaculada Clariana vs Andrea Tovar / Marjorie Cecchi3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesIzabella Victores vs Adriana Monsalve2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesClaudia van Essen / Sharon Maurno vs Claudia Donnelly / Geraldine Blakely7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesSharon MacIvor vs Melina Visser3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesFiorella Warger / Nancy Levy vs Cecilia Aguirre / Vanessa Keating1-6, 0-6
2025-09-15vs Fragachan (Coral Pine)Won 32
W#1 DoublesMaribel Guenaga-Gonzalez / Stephanie Voell vs Evelyn Leahy / BRIDGET MURPHY6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesIzabella Victores vs Joanna Nowakowska3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDanielle MacDougall / Hannah Standiford vs Maria Fragachan / Ileana Lopez6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesSharon MacIvor vs Gladys Mendez3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesCarole Bernstein / Nelly Foreiter vs Valentina Colimodio / Luz Celeste Pacheco6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ferrari (Alper JCC)62231739330
2Crandon Cranes62231739319
3Fragachan (Coral Pine)35152553375
4Picard (Coral Pine)26142655401
5Coral Reef Court Crushers17103064409

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Stephanie Voell
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.97
Nelly Foreiter
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.89
Inmaculada Clariana
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.89
Hannah Standiford
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.85
Izabella Victores
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.77
Maribel Guenaga-Gonzalez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Carole Bernstein
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.72
Beth Lang
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.65
Sharon Maurno
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.63
Claudia van Essen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.63
Gae Shapiro
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.58
Sharon MacIvor
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.53
Fiorella Warger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.53
Felicia Gould
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.52
Danielle MacDougall
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.50
Esther Copeland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.39
Helen Picard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.38
Nancy Levy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carole Bernstein + Nelly Foreiter241256% games−0.5% vs expected
Maribel Guenaga-Gonzalez + Sharon MacIvor224 matchesnot enough data
Danielle MacDougall + Sharon Maurno213 matchesnot enough data
Helen Picard + Maribel Guenaga-Gonzalez303 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Voell + Maribel Guenaga-Gonzalez303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Stephanie Voell
63W–59L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Nelly Foreiter
115W–83L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Inmaculada Clariana
87W–81L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Hannah Standiford
37W–37L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%78%21%
2.89
Izabella Victores
7W–8L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Maribel Guenaga-Gonzalez
65W–50L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Carole Bernstein
26W–21L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Beth Lang
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Sharon Maurno
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
2.65
3
Claudia van Essen
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
2.63
Gae Shapiro
2W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
2.63
2.5
Sharon MacIvor
68W–77L career · 10 lines in 2026
0%30%70%
2.58
Fiorella Warger
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
2.53
Felicia Gould
1W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
2.53
3
Danielle MacDougall
22W–41L career · 3 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
2.52
Esther Copeland
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
2.50
Helen Picard
26W–37L career · 1 line in 2026
79%21%<1%
2.39
Nancy Levy
1W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.38

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.