Search

Dana Baioni

CONCORD, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
250 matches · 123W–127L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.49
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 39 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
53%
stay 3.5
47%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 86% stay · 14% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.41. Lower than today’s 3.49 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
CA · 3.5
3 of 11

Dana is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams81 teams · 2012–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Dana has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

3.03.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Dana has gone from the 59th to the 78th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
3.5
61.4%
70W–44L · 56.5% of games
4.0
30.2%
19W–44L · 42.9% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
100%
4W–0L · 63.8% of games
7.5
60%
15W–10L · 52.5% of games
7.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 42.3% of games
8.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 41.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history250 matches
L
Tisha Kermoian / Pamela Owenschamps
2026-06-18 · #1 Doubles · with Miwon Vella
0.053below expectation — took 25% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Allene Rognon / Shawn Youngchamps
2026-06-14 · #3 Doubles · with Miwon Vella
+0.031better than expected — took 71% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Lara Flowers / Anne Poirier
2026-06-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Zhen Zhang
0.050below expectation — took 14% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Ina Bendich / SAKUNIE RUIZ
2026-06-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Abby Sexton
+0.051better than expected — took 71% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Bryn Strong / Vy Spoto
2026-05-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Choi
0.061below expectation — took 45% of games against 67% expected
6-5
W
Amy Lewis / Meredith Meade
2026-05-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Choi
0.042below expectation — took 60% of games against 72% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Valerie Epting / Megan Thomas
2026-05-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Miwon Vella
0.041below expectation — took 48% of games against 63% expected
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
Alissa Welch / Frances Chin
2026-05-12 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gail Pearson
+0.018better than expected — took 56% of games against 48% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Mary Anjedani / Kelly Kassela
2026-05-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandra Harris
+0.036better than expected — took 61% of games against 44% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
Zainab Saqib / Jill D Krimmel
2026-05-06 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Miwon Vella
0.037below expectation — took 14% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Sunita Mistry / Christine Keery
2026-05-04 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandra Harris
0.028below expectation — took 29% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Sandra Harris / Melissa Bach
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Golinski
+0.035better than expected — took 65% of games against 48% expected
7-6, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.