← Search

Dana Baioni

CONCORD, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
251 matches · 123W–128L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Dana Baioni to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history251 matches
L
Margaret Harrison / Jennifer Hill
2026-09-11 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Abby Sexton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
Tisha Kermoian / Pamela Owens
2026-06-18 · #1 Doubles · with Miwon Vella championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
Allene Rognon / Shawn Young
2026-06-14 · #3 Doubles · with Miwon Vella championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Zhen Zhang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Abby Sexton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Choi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-6
W
Amy Lewis / Meredith Meade
2026-05-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Choi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-05-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Miwon Vella
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-05-12 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gail Pearson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandra Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-05-06 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Miwon Vella
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-04 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandra Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams81 teams · 2012–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
60.3%
70W–46L · 56% of games
4.0
30.6%
19W–43L · 43% of games
7.0
100%
4W–0L · 63.8% of games
7.5
57.7%
15W–11L · 51.7% of games
7.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 42.3% of games
8.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 41.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
121 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
77 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
39 matches
#2 Singles
4%
10 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe