← Search

Megan Thomas

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Danville, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
173 matches · 96W–77L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history173 matches
L
2026-10-30 · BLACKHAWK CC CW7.5A-DT · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Christina Wiellette
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-29 · BLACKHAWK CC CW7.5A-DT · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tracey Hull
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-17 · BLACKHAWK CC CW6.5A · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Maureen Thompson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-10-16 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CW6.5A-DT · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michelle Gonzales
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-10-09 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CW6.5A-DT · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Angela Beck
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-01 · BLACKHAWK CC CW7.5A-DT · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Allyson Garcia
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-09-25 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CW6.5A-DT · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Shannon Fanning
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-28 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CW6.5A-DT · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kirsten Sines
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-05-31 · BLACKHAWK CC 18AW3.5A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Lassig
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-29 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AW3.5B-DT · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kirsten Sines
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-23 · BLACKHAWK CC 18AW3.5A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robin Kenny
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-05-15 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AW3.5B-DT · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Valerie Epting
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
69.4%
25W–11L · 60.6% of games
3.0
89.7%
26W–3L · 66.3% of games
3.5
47.1%
32W–36L · 49% of games
5.5
60%
6W–4L · 59.9% of games
6.5
20%
4W–16L · 39.2% of games
7.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 34.2% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 35% of the time
#1 Singles
35%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
56 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
22 matches
#2 Singles
6%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova