← Search

Jason Levin

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Annapolis, MD
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
39 matches · 20W–19L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history39 matches
W
2026-10-18 · R Owens · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tim Cogar
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-04-30 · Sanders · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stewart Royals
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-04-20 · Sanders · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stewart Royals
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
W
2024-05-21 · Thomasson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with JD Zachry
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
L
2024-05-13 · Thomasson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alan Chaney
loading the estimate
6-7, 7-5, 0-1
L
2024-04-25 · Thomasson · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
L
2024-04-21 · Thomasson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Kennedy
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-7, 0-1
W
2024-04-13 · Thomasson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barry Herman
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
L
2024-04-10 · Thomasson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joshua Fretz
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
N/A
2023-04-22 · Clark · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kathleen Su mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2023-04-18 · Clark · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lolita Blair mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2023-03-22 · Clark · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kathleen Su mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
66.7%
8W–4L · 54.6% of games
4.0
50%
4W–4L · 51.7% of games
7.5
75%
3W–1L · 64.4% of games
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 40.9% of games
8.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 42.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 31% of the time
#3 Doubles
31%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
8 matches
#1 Singles
15%
6 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match
Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King