← Search

Suzann Gobis

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Denver, CO
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
121 matches · 44W–77L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history121 matches
L
2026-06-11 · CACM NAVY · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Forman
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-28 · CACM NAVY · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Forman
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-14 · CACM NAVY · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Forman
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-05-07 · CACM NAVY · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Christine McKinlay
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
L
2025-07-17 · CACM PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan High
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2025-07-03 · CACM PURPLE · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Peggy Moody
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 2-6
L
2024-09-02 · DTP BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maureen Clarke
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
W
2024-08-30 · DTP BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maureen Clarke
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2024-08-21 · DTP BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Peggy Moody
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2024-08-07 · CACM ORANGE · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peggy Moody
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2024-07-31 · CACM ORANGE · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peggy Moody
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2024-07-29 · DTP BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Peggy Moody
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
34.2%
26W–50L · 43.6% of games
6.0
46.4%
13W–15L · 49.9% of games
7.0
8.3%
1W–11L · 35% of games
6.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 57.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
42 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
38 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova